<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 732 - Chhattisgarh High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201951</link>
    <description>Expenditure by a company on puja and Vishwakarma puja in factory premises was held not to be wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business, so it failed the section 37(1) test for business deduction. The company&#039;s status as a juristic person did not make the religious or ceremonial expenditure a business necessity, and the disallowance was upheld because no sufficient business nexus was shown.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 17:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 732 - Chhattisgarh High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201951</link>
      <description>Expenditure by a company on puja and Vishwakarma puja in factory premises was held not to be wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business, so it failed the section 37(1) test for business deduction. The company&#039;s status as a juristic person did not make the religious or ceremonial expenditure a business necessity, and the disallowance was upheld because no sufficient business nexus was shown.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201951</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>