<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 79 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201945</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on services received by a depot cannot be claimed directly by a manufacturing unit where the depot is the recipient of the taxable service and is not registered as an input service distributor. The credit distribution mechanism under the rules must be followed, and credit cannot be taken by the Kolkata unit on the basis of service tax paid for services availed at the Jaipur depot. On that footing, the claimed credit was not admissible and its denial was in law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 14:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 79 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201945</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on services received by a depot cannot be claimed directly by a manufacturing unit where the depot is the recipient of the taxable service and is not registered as an input service distributor. The credit distribution mechanism under the rules must be followed, and credit cannot be taken by the Kolkata unit on the basis of service tax paid for services availed at the Jaipur depot. On that footing, the claimed credit was not admissible and its denial was in law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>