<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 131 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201938</link>
    <description>HC upheld the duty demand for clandestine manufacture and removal of Portland cement, finding the authorities&#039; inference-based on large limestone quarrying and a clinker shortage-justified to estimate unaccounted production and resulting duty escapement. The court rejected the appellant&#039;s contention that only positive proof of manufacture would validate the demand. As the lower authority had already waived the penalty, HC found no illegality or reason to interfere with the order sustaining the duty assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 17:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 131 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201938</link>
      <description>HC upheld the duty demand for clandestine manufacture and removal of Portland cement, finding the authorities&#039; inference-based on large limestone quarrying and a clinker shortage-justified to estimate unaccounted production and resulting duty escapement. The court rejected the appellant&#039;s contention that only positive proof of manufacture would validate the demand. As the lower authority had already waived the penalty, HC found no illegality or reason to interfere with the order sustaining the duty assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201938</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>