<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 651 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201919</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the respondents, in a writ petition, to comply with the appellate authority&#039;s directions for retesting samples and returning the bank guarantee. The Court emphasized the importance of procedural compliance, timely responses to legal directives, and adherence to statutory timelines. It highlighted the significance of following due process and respecting decisions of appellate authorities in customs regulation matters. The Court set aside the actions of the Assistant Commissioner of Customs regarding the bank guarantee, leaving the legality of the revisional application and condonation of delay to be determined by the Revisional Authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 14:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 651 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201919</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the respondents, in a writ petition, to comply with the appellate authority&#039;s directions for retesting samples and returning the bank guarantee. The Court emphasized the importance of procedural compliance, timely responses to legal directives, and adherence to statutory timelines. It highlighted the significance of following due process and respecting decisions of appellate authorities in customs regulation matters. The Court set aside the actions of the Assistant Commissioner of Customs regarding the bank guarantee, leaving the legality of the revisional application and condonation of delay to be determined by the Revisional Authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>