<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 361 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201906</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appeal was maintainable against the communication of the decision to detain goods for recovery of dues. The order dismissing the appeal was set aside, and the matter was remanded for a fresh decision, emphasizing the importance of considering the impact on the party&#039;s rights in determining appealability. The detention of goods without dues against the Appellant was deemed unjustified, leading to a prompt resolution of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175496" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 361 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201906</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appeal was maintainable against the communication of the decision to detain goods for recovery of dues. The order dismissing the appeal was set aside, and the matter was remanded for a fresh decision, emphasizing the importance of considering the impact on the party&#039;s rights in determining appealability. The detention of goods without dues against the Appellant was deemed unjustified, leading to a prompt resolution of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201906</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>