<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 238 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201900</link>
    <description>Imported goods were subject to a country-of-origin marking requirement under the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958, but the exemption notification was interpreted to cover the importer on the facts found. The Tribunal&#039;s view that the sewing machines were imported for use in manufacture, rather than for trade purposes, was treated as a plausible construction of the exemption clause and was accepted. On that basis, the exemption applied and the confiscation and penalty orders based solely on non-compliance with the marking requirement could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2013 14:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175490" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 238 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201900</link>
      <description>Imported goods were subject to a country-of-origin marking requirement under the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958, but the exemption notification was interpreted to cover the importer on the facts found. The Tribunal&#039;s view that the sewing machines were imported for use in manufacture, rather than for trade purposes, was treated as a plausible construction of the exemption clause and was accepted. On that basis, the exemption applied and the confiscation and penalty orders based solely on non-compliance with the marking requirement could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201900</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>