<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201898</link>
    <description>Extended limitation under Section 11A applied where the show cause notice alleged manufacture and clearance of excisable goods without duty payment with intent to evade, and the department&#039;s knowledge arose within the five-year period; the demand was therefore not time-barred. Furniture such as chairs, beds, tables and desks did not cease to be excisable merely because they were fixed at the site, because fixation alone does not make movable goods immovable property. The items were treated as manufactured goods falling under the relevant tariff headings, and only articles genuinely immovable were excluded. The adjudication order confirming duty, penalty and related reliefs was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 12:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175489" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201898</link>
      <description>Extended limitation under Section 11A applied where the show cause notice alleged manufacture and clearance of excisable goods without duty payment with intent to evade, and the department&#039;s knowledge arose within the five-year period; the demand was therefore not time-barred. Furniture such as chairs, beds, tables and desks did not cease to be excisable merely because they were fixed at the site, because fixation alone does not make movable goods immovable property. The items were treated as manufactured goods falling under the relevant tariff headings, and only articles genuinely immovable were excluded. The adjudication order confirming duty, penalty and related reliefs was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201898</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>