https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201890 The Tribunal upheld the order confirming the Commissioner's decision on clandestine removal of goods and non-payment of duty, allowing an extended period of limitation for investigations related to clandestine activities. Despite the appellant's arguments on the time limit and lack of new evidence in subsequent investigations, the Tribunal affirmed duty liability based on evidence from initial investigations. The appeal was dismissed, with reduced penalties on Directors, as both the CIT (Appeals) and CESTAT findings were deemed conclusive, with no substantial question of law identified for further consideration. en-us Wed, 23 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201890 The Tribunal upheld the order confirming the Commissioner's decision on clandestine removal of goods and non-payment of duty, allowing an extended period of limitation for investigations related to clandestine activities. Despite the appellant's arguments on the time limit and lack of new evidence in subsequent investigations, the Tribunal affirmed duty liability based on evidence from initial investigations. The appeal was dismissed, with reduced penalties on Directors, as both the CIT (Appeals) and CESTAT findings were deemed conclusive, with no substantial question of law identified for further consideration. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 23 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201890