https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201886 The Additional Commissioner confirmed a demand against the assessees, leading to an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) with a waiver application under Section 35F. The Commissioner (Appeals) set aside part of the demand, prompting a Revenue appeal. However, the initial appeal was disposed of without addressing the Section 35F application, necessitating a remittal for proper consideration. The subsequent appeal by the Revenue against the setting aside of the demand also resulted in a remand for further review. en-us Tue, 27 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Jan 2011 17:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201886 The Additional Commissioner confirmed a demand against the assessees, leading to an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) with a waiver application under Section 35F. The Commissioner (Appeals) set aside part of the demand, prompting a Revenue appeal. However, the initial appeal was disposed of without addressing the Section 35F application, necessitating a remittal for proper consideration. The subsequent appeal by the Revenue against the setting aside of the demand also resulted in a remand for further review. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 27 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201886