https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201882 The court set aside the order classifying goods as excisable, finding it lacked a reasonable opportunity for the petitioner and violated natural justice principles. The order dated 04.09.2010 was declared illegal due to lack of opportunity before its passing. Emphasizing compliance with natural justice, the court held that statutory provisions outweighed Board instructions. One writ petition was dismissed, the other allowed with costs, directing the petitioner to file objections against the notice and continue operations pending resolution. Fair procedures and legal compliance were underscored by the court. en-us Mon, 27 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Dec 2011 18:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201882 The court set aside the order classifying goods as excisable, finding it lacked a reasonable opportunity for the petitioner and violated natural justice principles. The order dated 04.09.2010 was declared illegal due to lack of opportunity before its passing. Emphasizing compliance with natural justice, the court held that statutory provisions outweighed Board instructions. One writ petition was dismissed, the other allowed with costs, directing the petitioner to file objections against the notice and continue operations pending resolution. Fair procedures and legal compliance were underscored by the court. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 27 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201882