<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 646 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201876</link>
    <description>In a stay application before CESTAT, the Tribunal balanced prima facie merits, undue hardship, alleged suppression, and Revenue protection before granting only partial interim relief. It noted that the adjudicating authority had given a reasoned order on taxability, limitation, reimbursement, and penalty, and that the appellant had already made a substantial deposit. The Tribunal directed a further pre-deposit of Rs. 2 crores and stayed recovery of the balance demand on compliance, preserving the appeal hearing while protecting the Revenue&#039;s interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 16:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 646 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201876</link>
      <description>In a stay application before CESTAT, the Tribunal balanced prima facie merits, undue hardship, alleged suppression, and Revenue protection before granting only partial interim relief. It noted that the adjudicating authority had given a reasoned order on taxability, limitation, reimbursement, and penalty, and that the appellant had already made a substantial deposit. The Tribunal directed a further pre-deposit of Rs. 2 crores and stayed recovery of the balance demand on compliance, preserving the appeal hearing while protecting the Revenue&#039;s interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201876</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>