<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 358 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201874</link>
    <description>The judgment confirmed a service tax liability of Rs. 74,10,217 against the appellant for providing transportation services, categorized as &quot;rent-a-cab&quot; services. Penalties were imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. However, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing that the services provided were not akin to &quot;rent-a-cab&quot; services based on the contractual terms and mode of payment. The Tribunal considered the nature of the services provided, highlighting that operating trips on a per kilometer basis with the vehicle under the operator&#039;s control did not constitute &quot;rent-a-cab&quot; services. Additionally, the demand for payment was deemed barred by limitation, resulting in the appeal being allowed on merits and limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 15:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175466" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 358 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201874</link>
      <description>The judgment confirmed a service tax liability of Rs. 74,10,217 against the appellant for providing transportation services, categorized as &quot;rent-a-cab&quot; services. Penalties were imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. However, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing that the services provided were not akin to &quot;rent-a-cab&quot; services based on the contractual terms and mode of payment. The Tribunal considered the nature of the services provided, highlighting that operating trips on a per kilometer basis with the vehicle under the operator&#039;s control did not constitute &quot;rent-a-cab&quot; services. Additionally, the demand for payment was deemed barred by limitation, resulting in the appeal being allowed on merits and limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>