<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 618 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201864</link>
    <description>Customs Act convictions for recovery of gold biscuits may rest on reliable testimony of customs and border security officials even without independent witnesses where independent assistance was not practically available. Recovery was treated as proved because the articles were established as gold and the accused did not discredit evidence of possession. Statements signed or thumb-marked under the Customs Act were admissible where no material showed coercion or pressure; Section 24 of the Evidence Act did not exclude them. The convictions and sentences were upheld, and the petitions were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 16:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 618 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201864</link>
      <description>Customs Act convictions for recovery of gold biscuits may rest on reliable testimony of customs and border security officials even without independent witnesses where independent assistance was not practically available. Recovery was treated as proved because the articles were established as gold and the accused did not discredit evidence of possession. Statements signed or thumb-marked under the Customs Act were admissible where no material showed coercion or pressure; Section 24 of the Evidence Act did not exclude them. The convictions and sentences were upheld, and the petitions were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201864</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>