<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 128 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201856</link>
    <description>The High Court held that authorities cannot reduce penalties below the minimum prescribed limit under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, without invoking Section 80. The Court quashed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing that penalties cannot be dropped or reduced below the statutory limit. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration in line with legal principles and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 17:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 128 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201856</link>
      <description>The High Court held that authorities cannot reduce penalties below the minimum prescribed limit under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, without invoking Section 80. The Court quashed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing that penalties cannot be dropped or reduced below the statutory limit. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration in line with legal principles and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>