https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201854 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants regarding jurisdiction, finding that the Commissioner in Kolkata lacked jurisdiction due to the location of the appellants' Head Office. However, the Tribunal upheld the service tax demand prior to 1-6-2007, based on contract details indicating the services provided were taxable. To address financial hardship, the Tribunal reduced the pre-deposit amount to Rs. 2 crores and granted a waiver on the remaining sum during the appeal process. Compliance reporting was set for 26th July, 2010. en-us Mon, 19 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Jan 2011 17:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201854 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants regarding jurisdiction, finding that the Commissioner in Kolkata lacked jurisdiction due to the location of the appellants' Head Office. However, the Tribunal upheld the service tax demand prior to 1-6-2007, based on contract details indicating the services provided were taxable. To address financial hardship, the Tribunal reduced the pre-deposit amount to Rs. 2 crores and granted a waiver on the remaining sum during the appeal process. Compliance reporting was set for 26th July, 2010. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 19 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201854