<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 230 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201848</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision to reduce the penalty imposed on the manufacturer of refrigerator parts from Rs. 2,94,919 to Rs. 1 lakh. The Tribunal found that the penalty reduction was reasonable as there was no evidence of deliberate evasion of excise duty during the shifting of manufacturing premises, which were subsequently registered and regularized. The Tribunal concluded that penal action was not warranted for failure to follow vague directions but only for actual violations of the law, ultimately rejecting the department&#039;s appeal for enhancement of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 14:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175440" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 230 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201848</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision to reduce the penalty imposed on the manufacturer of refrigerator parts from Rs. 2,94,919 to Rs. 1 lakh. The Tribunal found that the penalty reduction was reasonable as there was no evidence of deliberate evasion of excise duty during the shifting of manufacturing premises, which were subsequently registered and regularized. The Tribunal concluded that penal action was not warranted for failure to follow vague directions but only for actual violations of the law, ultimately rejecting the department&#039;s appeal for enhancement of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>