<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 34 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201841</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, rejecting the disallowance under section 14A for interest income and allowing the claim of bad debts. The Tribunal emphasized the business nature of the activities and the applicability of relevant legal provisions in determining the outcomes of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 12:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 34 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201841</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, rejecting the disallowance under section 14A for interest income and allowing the claim of bad debts. The Tribunal emphasized the business nature of the activities and the applicability of relevant legal provisions in determining the outcomes of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201841</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>