<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 228 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI-LB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201829</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled on the interpretation of an exemption notification regarding cannulae for veins and blood vessels, granting a waiver of pre-deposit and stay on recovery pending appeal, consistent with prior favorable decisions for appellants. Regarding the maintainability of a reference to a Larger Bench, the Tribunal found the reference unjustified, emphasizing adherence to legal standards set by the Apex Court for such referrals. The judgment ordered the return of the reference to the respective Benches, stressing the importance of meeting established legal criteria to ensure consistency and adherence to judicial principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2023 14:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175422" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 228 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI-LB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201829</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled on the interpretation of an exemption notification regarding cannulae for veins and blood vessels, granting a waiver of pre-deposit and stay on recovery pending appeal, consistent with prior favorable decisions for appellants. Regarding the maintainability of a reference to a Larger Bench, the Tribunal found the reference unjustified, emphasizing adherence to legal standards set by the Apex Court for such referrals. The judgment ordered the return of the reference to the respective Benches, stressing the importance of meeting established legal criteria to ensure consistency and adherence to judicial principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201829</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>