https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201818 The Tribunal remitted the matter back to the DRP for reevaluation and issuance of a detailed direction under section 144C of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the need for the assessee to be given a fair opportunity to be heard. The Tribunal found that the DRP's direction was too concise and failed to adequately address the assessee's objections and submissions, contravening principles of natural justice. The decision was not a determination on the merits of the case but was allowed for statistical purposes. en-us Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Jan 2017 12:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201818 The Tribunal remitted the matter back to the DRP for reevaluation and issuance of a detailed direction under section 144C of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the need for the assessee to be given a fair opportunity to be heard. The Tribunal found that the DRP's direction was too concise and failed to adequately address the assessee's objections and submissions, contravening principles of natural justice. The decision was not a determination on the merits of the case but was allowed for statistical purposes. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201818