<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 351 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201799</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s stay petition seeking a waiver of pre-deposit of service tax, interest, and penalties. The appellant&#039;s liability for providing commercial training or coaching was disputed due to differing interpretations of a retrospective amendment. Citing relevant case laws, the Tribunal found the service tax amount time-barred and granted the waiver based on limitation issues. The recovery was stayed until the appeal&#039;s final disposal, acknowledging the broadened scope of &quot;Commercial Training and Coaching Center&quot; under the retrospective change but ruling in favor of the appellant on limitation grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 10:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175392" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 351 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201799</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s stay petition seeking a waiver of pre-deposit of service tax, interest, and penalties. The appellant&#039;s liability for providing commercial training or coaching was disputed due to differing interpretations of a retrospective amendment. Citing relevant case laws, the Tribunal found the service tax amount time-barred and granted the waiver based on limitation issues. The recovery was stayed until the appeal&#039;s final disposal, acknowledging the broadened scope of &quot;Commercial Training and Coaching Center&quot; under the retrospective change but ruling in favor of the appellant on limitation grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>