https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201789 The court held that the Commissioner of Customs in New Delhi lacked jurisdiction to suspend a CHA licence issued by the Commissioner of Customs in Kolkata under Regulation 9(1). The suspension under Regulation 9(2) for Delhi Customs jurisdiction was deemed inappropriate. The court set aside the suspension order, emphasizing compliance with the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 2004, and the need for proper jurisdictional authority in such matters. The Commissioner of Customs in New Delhi was directed to take lawful actions, including withdrawing acceptance of the intimation for business transactions in the New Delhi zone. en-us Fri, 12 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Jan 2011 16:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201789 The court held that the Commissioner of Customs in New Delhi lacked jurisdiction to suspend a CHA licence issued by the Commissioner of Customs in Kolkata under Regulation 9(1). The suspension under Regulation 9(2) for Delhi Customs jurisdiction was deemed inappropriate. The court set aside the suspension order, emphasizing compliance with the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 2004, and the need for proper jurisdictional authority in such matters. The Commissioner of Customs in New Delhi was directed to take lawful actions, including withdrawing acceptance of the intimation for business transactions in the New Delhi zone. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 12 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201789