<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 90 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201781</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit on service tax paid for pollution-level certification was held sustainable because the show-cause notices did not allege failure of the input service test under Rule 2(l) and instead proceeded only on the premise that the service was not taxable. Where service tax has been paid by the service provider and accepted by the jurisdictional authorities, the recipient cannot be denied credit by re-opening the taxability of the provider&#039;s service. The certification also had a direct nexus with manufacturing, as it was required for environmental compliance in cement production, so it qualified as an input service. The denial of credit was therefore unsustainable and the assessee succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 13:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175375" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 90 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201781</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit on service tax paid for pollution-level certification was held sustainable because the show-cause notices did not allege failure of the input service test under Rule 2(l) and instead proceeded only on the premise that the service was not taxable. Where service tax has been paid by the service provider and accepted by the jurisdictional authorities, the recipient cannot be denied credit by re-opening the taxability of the provider&#039;s service. The certification also had a direct nexus with manufacturing, as it was required for environmental compliance in cement production, so it qualified as an input service. The denial of credit was therefore unsustainable and the assessee succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>