https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201780 The Tribunal reclassified the services as insurance auxiliary services rather than security services, emphasizing the nature of the services over terminology. It directed the appellants to provide evidence for out-of-pocket expenses exclusion from service tax valuation and claim of abatement. The lower authority's failure to consider the evidence led to the appeal being allowed for a thorough review by the original authority, granting a stay petition. en-us Thu, 02 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201780 The Tribunal reclassified the services as insurance auxiliary services rather than security services, emphasizing the nature of the services over terminology. It directed the appellants to provide evidence for out-of-pocket expenses exclusion from service tax valuation and claim of abatement. The lower authority's failure to consider the evidence led to the appeal being allowed for a thorough review by the original authority, granting a stay petition. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 02 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201780