<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 556 - Madras High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201747</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions, allowing the petitioners to seek remedies under the Income-tax Act within four weeks. The respondents were prohibited from taking coercive recovery actions during this period. The court highlighted that the nature of the contract and the applicability of Section 194C involve factual inquiries unsuitable for resolution through writ petitions. No costs were awarded, and related miscellaneous petitions were concluded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 15:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 556 - Madras High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201747</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions, allowing the petitioners to seek remedies under the Income-tax Act within four weeks. The respondents were prohibited from taking coercive recovery actions during this period. The court highlighted that the nature of the contract and the applicability of Section 194C involve factual inquiries unsuitable for resolution through writ petitions. No costs were awarded, and related miscellaneous petitions were concluded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201747</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>