<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 25 - CESTAT,  CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201746</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI denied credit for imported methanol due to lack of evidence, but allowed credit for trading fee for scrap disposal, service of vehicles, and consultation for water drawal system as evidence was provided. The denial of credit for the latter items was set aside, and the claims were remitted for a fresh decision. The judgment highlighted the importance of providing detailed information to support credit claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 07:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175340" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 25 - CESTAT,  CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201746</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI denied credit for imported methanol due to lack of evidence, but allowed credit for trading fee for scrap disposal, service of vehicles, and consultation for water drawal system as evidence was provided. The denial of credit for the latter items was set aside, and the claims were remitted for a fresh decision. The judgment highlighted the importance of providing detailed information to support credit claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>