<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 222 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201745</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the refund of service tax on fund transfers between branches of the same legal entity. It was held that transactions within the same legal entity do not attract service tax, even with credit and debit notes adjustments. The Department failed to demonstrate that services were provided to a different legal entity. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the refund claim, rejecting the unjust enrichment principle as the New Delhi branch did not collect service tax from third parties and the service charges were reversed without actual receipt.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 13:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 222 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201745</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the refund of service tax on fund transfers between branches of the same legal entity. It was held that transactions within the same legal entity do not attract service tax, even with credit and debit notes adjustments. The Department failed to demonstrate that services were provided to a different legal entity. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the refund claim, rejecting the unjust enrichment principle as the New Delhi branch did not collect service tax from third parties and the service charges were reversed without actual receipt.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>