<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 73 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201730</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on the disallowance of VSAT, Leaseline, and Transaction charges under section 40(a)(ia) and the classification of income as capital gains. However, the issue of disallowance under section 14A was remanded back to the AO for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 05:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175326" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 73 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201730</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on the disallowance of VSAT, Leaseline, and Transaction charges under section 40(a)(ia) and the classification of income as capital gains. However, the issue of disallowance under section 14A was remanded back to the AO for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201730</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>