<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 77 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201726</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the CESTAT to dispose of the appeal without any pre-deposit within six months, emphasizing that the construction of a tower with an antenna as capital goods was distinct from previous cases. The judgment aimed to ensure justice by expeditiously resolving the appeal without requiring the appellants to make the pre-deposit as directed by the Tribunal, based on legal arguments and precedents cited.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2013 15:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175322" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 77 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201726</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the CESTAT to dispose of the appeal without any pre-deposit within six months, emphasizing that the construction of a tower with an antenna as capital goods was distinct from previous cases. The judgment aimed to ensure justice by expeditiously resolving the appeal without requiring the appellants to make the pre-deposit as directed by the Tribunal, based on legal arguments and precedents cited.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201726</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>