https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201723 The appellant's stay application to halt the recovery of irregular Cenvat Credit and penalty was granted, restraining coercive action by the department until disposal of the stay application. Appeals and cross-objections from 2008 were considered, with a delay in listing the matter for hearing addressed by directing the Registry to explain the delay. The Tribunal emphasized the revenue implications, directing notification to relevant authorities and scheduling adjourned matters with a fresh notice to the assessee, ensuring disclosure of advocates' appearances for both parties. en-us Tue, 25 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Jul 2013 15:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201723 The appellant's stay application to halt the recovery of irregular Cenvat Credit and penalty was granted, restraining coercive action by the department until disposal of the stay application. Appeals and cross-objections from 2008 were considered, with a delay in listing the matter for hearing addressed by directing the Registry to explain the delay. The Tribunal emphasized the revenue implications, directing notification to relevant authorities and scheduling adjourned matters with a fresh notice to the assessee, ensuring disclosure of advocates' appearances for both parties. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 25 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201723