https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201720 The appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, was filed by the revenue against the Tribunal's order regarding the wrong availing of cenvat credit on inputs for iron and steel products. The Tribunal found the input purchases from Tata Iron and Steel Company (TISCO) to be genuine, emphasizing the lack of evidence of wrongful intent. Relying on previous judgments, the Tribunal upheld the legitimacy of the input supplies from TISCO, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and affirming the rightful availing of cenvat credit. en-us Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 31 Jan 2011 07:49:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201720 The appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, was filed by the revenue against the Tribunal's order regarding the wrong availing of cenvat credit on inputs for iron and steel products. The Tribunal found the input purchases from Tata Iron and Steel Company (TISCO) to be genuine, emphasizing the lack of evidence of wrongful intent. Relying on previous judgments, the Tribunal upheld the legitimacy of the input supplies from TISCO, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and affirming the rightful availing of cenvat credit. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201720