https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201709 Conflicting laboratory reports on seized imported cottonseed oil justified conditional reprocessing and retesting because the goods were perishable and continued detention risked deterioration and financial loss. The Court accepted that justice would be served by permitting reprocessing, but only after an expert opinion confirmed that the goods, after reprocessing, would meet the standards under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955. To avoid further dispute over testing, the sample was directed to the Central Food Laboratory, Mysore. The petition was therefore allowed in part, with the customs adjudication merits left open. en-us Mon, 17 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 30 Jan 2011 11:39:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201709 Conflicting laboratory reports on seized imported cottonseed oil justified conditional reprocessing and retesting because the goods were perishable and continued detention risked deterioration and financial loss. The Court accepted that justice would be served by permitting reprocessing, but only after an expert opinion confirmed that the goods, after reprocessing, would meet the standards under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955. To avoid further dispute over testing, the sample was directed to the Central Food Laboratory, Mysore. The petition was therefore allowed in part, with the customs adjudication merits left open. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 17 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201709