https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201708 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that they were not liable to pay excise duty for goods cleared to a 100% EOU as they were exempted from duty. The Tribunal set aside the duty demand and penalty imposed by the authorities, finding no illegality in the assessee's actions. The revenue's contention that the assessee failed to comply with Rule 16(3) requirements was dismissed, with the Tribunal deeming the proceedings against the assessee as without jurisdiction. The Tribunal affirmed that the assessee's compliance with legal provisions and exemption notifications justified the dismissal of the revenue's appeal. en-us Thu, 06 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Jun 2013 11:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201708 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that they were not liable to pay excise duty for goods cleared to a 100% EOU as they were exempted from duty. The Tribunal set aside the duty demand and penalty imposed by the authorities, finding no illegality in the assessee's actions. The revenue's contention that the assessee failed to comply with Rule 16(3) requirements was dismissed, with the Tribunal deeming the proceedings against the assessee as without jurisdiction. The Tribunal affirmed that the assessee's compliance with legal provisions and exemption notifications justified the dismissal of the revenue's appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 06 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201708