<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 18 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201707</link>
    <description>The court upheld the decision that the appeal was time-barred, as it was filed beyond the condonable period. The computation of the limitation period was found to be correct, excluding weekends and holidays in the calculation. The authorities were deemed to lack the power to condone delays beyond the specified timeframe. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition, affirming the refusal to condone the delay and imposing costs of Rs. 20,000.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2018 16:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175305" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 18 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201707</link>
      <description>The court upheld the decision that the appeal was time-barred, as it was filed beyond the condonable period. The computation of the limitation period was found to be correct, excluding weekends and holidays in the calculation. The authorities were deemed to lack the power to condone delays beyond the specified timeframe. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition, affirming the refusal to condone the delay and imposing costs of Rs. 20,000.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>