https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201679 The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Commissioner (Appeals) to hear the appeal on its merits without requiring a pre-deposit, as the Appellant had a prima facie case deserving a hearing despite the initial dismissal due to lack of pre-deposit. The Tribunal recognized the Appellant's lack of legal awareness and disposed of both the stay petition and the appeal, directing the Commissioner (Appeals) to proceed without emphasizing any pre-deposit requirement. en-us Mon, 07 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Jan 2011 23:32:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201679 The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Commissioner (Appeals) to hear the appeal on its merits without requiring a pre-deposit, as the Appellant had a prima facie case deserving a hearing despite the initial dismissal due to lack of pre-deposit. The Tribunal recognized the Appellant's lack of legal awareness and disposed of both the stay petition and the appeal, directing the Commissioner (Appeals) to proceed without emphasizing any pre-deposit requirement. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 07 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201679