<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 346 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201665</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and remanded the case to the Original Adjudicating Authority for a fresh decision after the pending High Court ruling on conflicting decisions regarding the admissibility of credit for service tax on sales promotion and GTA services. All issues remain open for reconsideration, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive assessment post-resolution of the pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 20:51:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175267" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 346 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201665</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and remanded the case to the Original Adjudicating Authority for a fresh decision after the pending High Court ruling on conflicting decisions regarding the admissibility of credit for service tax on sales promotion and GTA services. All issues remain open for reconsideration, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive assessment post-resolution of the pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201665</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>