https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201649 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision, ruling that the appellant lacked standing to challenge the imposition of service tax on buses hired by private bus operators. The Court emphasized that only the aggrieved private bus operators could challenge the tax demand and utilize statutory remedies under the Finance Act. Since the tax was demanded from private bus operators, they were the appropriate parties to challenge the notices and seek remedies, not the appellant who was not directly affected by the tax demand. The appeal was dismissed for lack of merit. en-us Wed, 12 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Nov 2022 11:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201649 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision, ruling that the appellant lacked standing to challenge the imposition of service tax on buses hired by private bus operators. The Court emphasized that only the aggrieved private bus operators could challenge the tax demand and utilize statutory remedies under the Finance Act. Since the tax was demanded from private bus operators, they were the appropriate parties to challenge the notices and seek remedies, not the appellant who was not directly affected by the tax demand. The appeal was dismissed for lack of merit. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 12 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201649