<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 555 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201647</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals against Service Tax demand orders due to the appellant&#039;s dilatory tactics, which prejudiced the Revenue. Despite multiple opportunities for compliance and modifications to the stay order, the appellant engaged in delaying tactics, leading to the dismissal of the appeals. The Tribunal emphasized the need to prevent undue hardship to the Revenue, citing Supreme Court precedents and requiring compliance with procedural requirements such as filing a Vakalatnama. The dismissal was subject to the outcome of a Civil Appeal filed by the appellant before the Supreme Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 15:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175250" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 555 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201647</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals against Service Tax demand orders due to the appellant&#039;s dilatory tactics, which prejudiced the Revenue. Despite multiple opportunities for compliance and modifications to the stay order, the appellant engaged in delaying tactics, leading to the dismissal of the appeals. The Tribunal emphasized the need to prevent undue hardship to the Revenue, citing Supreme Court precedents and requiring compliance with procedural requirements such as filing a Vakalatnama. The dismissal was subject to the outcome of a Civil Appeal filed by the appellant before the Supreme Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201647</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>