<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 722 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201630</link>
    <description>Service tax demand was found unsustainable because the show cause notice was issued beyond the normal limitation period and failed to allege the elements required for the extended period, including wilful suppression, fraud or misstatement. The demand was therefore held time-barred and set aside, and the penalties were also set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 23:16:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175234" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 722 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201630</link>
      <description>Service tax demand was found unsustainable because the show cause notice was issued beyond the normal limitation period and failed to allege the elements required for the extended period, including wilful suppression, fraud or misstatement. The demand was therefore held time-barred and set aside, and the penalties were also set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201630</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>