https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201609 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Calcutta High Court's order affirming the Tribunal's findings on a bona fide mistake in duty payment. The Court upheld the lower courts' conclusion that there was no evidence of intentional duty evasion and cited precedent to clarify that penalties under Section 11AC are for deliberate deception, which was not present in this case. The Court found no grounds for interference and affirmed the decision based on the genuine error in duty payment. en-us Mon, 13 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Jan 2011 19:52:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201609 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Calcutta High Court's order affirming the Tribunal's findings on a bona fide mistake in duty payment. The Court upheld the lower courts' conclusion that there was no evidence of intentional duty evasion and cited precedent to clarify that penalties under Section 11AC are for deliberate deception, which was not present in this case. The Court found no grounds for interference and affirmed the decision based on the genuine error in duty payment. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 13 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201609