<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 263 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201560</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s deposit directions under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act required the appellants to pre-deposit part of the duty, and in one case part of the penalty, as a condition for continuation of the appeals. Although time for compliance was extended twice, with clear warning that non-compliance would lead to disposal of the appeals without further opportunity, the appellants still made no deposit and did not appear. The Tribunal therefore dismissed all appeals for persistent failure to comply with the deposit conditions imposed under its earlier orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 23:54:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175168" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 263 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201560</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s deposit directions under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act required the appellants to pre-deposit part of the duty, and in one case part of the penalty, as a condition for continuation of the appeals. Although time for compliance was extended twice, with clear warning that non-compliance would lead to disposal of the appeals without further opportunity, the appellants still made no deposit and did not appear. The Tribunal therefore dismissed all appeals for persistent failure to comply with the deposit conditions imposed under its earlier orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201560</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>