https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201559 Pre-deposit of the balance duty and entire penalty was dispensed with because the appellants had already deposited a substantial part of the confirmed duty and the dispute was confined to denial of Modvat credit on imported capital goods for want of the original bill of entry. As the duplicate bill of entry was stated to have been lost and a copy was being procured from Customs, the impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded to the original adjudicating authority. The authority was directed to allow production of the relevant bill of entry and decide the credit claim afresh. en-us Mon, 27 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Dec 2015 12:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201559 Pre-deposit of the balance duty and entire penalty was dispensed with because the appellants had already deposited a substantial part of the confirmed duty and the dispute was confined to denial of Modvat credit on imported capital goods for want of the original bill of entry. As the duplicate bill of entry was stated to have been lost and a copy was being procured from Customs, the impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded to the original adjudicating authority. The authority was directed to allow production of the relevant bill of entry and decide the credit claim afresh. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 27 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201559