<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 117 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201553</link>
    <description>The Allahabad HC noted that reassessment notice under section 148 was time-barred and therefore lacked justification; the reassessment challenge was allowed on that basis. It also recorded that the assessee had established the identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of the depositors, supporting the explanation for the credits. On these findings, the department&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 01:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 117 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201553</link>
      <description>The Allahabad HC noted that reassessment notice under section 148 was time-barred and therefore lacked justification; the reassessment challenge was allowed on that basis. It also recorded that the assessee had established the identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of the depositors, supporting the explanation for the credits. On these findings, the department&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>