<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 116 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201552</link>
    <description>Misdeclaration of the true nature, composition and identity of imported goods disentitles an importer from customs exemption under Notification No. 40/2002-Cus and the Indo-Nepal treaty protocol, because eligibility depends on correct disclosure and established factual basis. The goods were held classifiable under Chapter Heading 2936, not Chapter Heading 2309, so the Tribunal&#039;s contrary view could not stand. In the absence of any manufacturing process in Nepal, relief under Notification No. 9/96 issued under the Customs Act was also unsustainable. The Tribunal&#039;s order was set aside and the adjudicating and appellate authorities&#039; orders were restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 01:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 116 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201552</link>
      <description>Misdeclaration of the true nature, composition and identity of imported goods disentitles an importer from customs exemption under Notification No. 40/2002-Cus and the Indo-Nepal treaty protocol, because eligibility depends on correct disclosure and established factual basis. The goods were held classifiable under Chapter Heading 2936, not Chapter Heading 2309, so the Tribunal&#039;s contrary view could not stand. In the absence of any manufacturing process in Nepal, relief under Notification No. 9/96 issued under the Customs Act was also unsustainable. The Tribunal&#039;s order was set aside and the adjudicating and appellate authorities&#039; orders were restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201552</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>