<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 75 - Patna High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201551</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court&#039;s interpretation of Section 27 of the Wealth Tax Act 1957, dismissing the Commissioner of Wealth Tax&#039;s challenge. Following the dismissal, the petitioner failed to comply by approaching the Assessing Officer for a final order and instead filed a writ petition with the High Court. The High Court, noting the petitioner&#039;s unnecessary delay and hindrance in the assessment process, dismissed the writ petition, directing the Assessing Officer to issue a final order within four months. The petitioner was also instructed to pay costs of Rs.10,000, to be deposited in the Government Treasury under the Assessing Officer&#039;s orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 23:53:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175159" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 75 - Patna High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201551</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court&#039;s interpretation of Section 27 of the Wealth Tax Act 1957, dismissing the Commissioner of Wealth Tax&#039;s challenge. Following the dismissal, the petitioner failed to comply by approaching the Assessing Officer for a final order and instead filed a writ petition with the High Court. The High Court, noting the petitioner&#039;s unnecessary delay and hindrance in the assessment process, dismissed the writ petition, directing the Assessing Officer to issue a final order within four months. The petitioner was also instructed to pay costs of Rs.10,000, to be deposited in the Government Treasury under the Assessing Officer&#039;s orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201551</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>