https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201525 The Tribunal upheld the impugned order rejecting the refund claim, citing the principles of unjust enrichment and lack of concrete evidence that the duty paid was not included in the final product's cost, despite a later clarification from a Chartered Accountant stating otherwise. The Appeal was dismissed based on the timing and relevance of the clarification issued after the impugned order. en-us Tue, 30 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Jan 2011 16:10:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201525 The Tribunal upheld the impugned order rejecting the refund claim, citing the principles of unjust enrichment and lack of concrete evidence that the duty paid was not included in the final product's cost, despite a later clarification from a Chartered Accountant stating otherwise. The Appeal was dismissed based on the timing and relevance of the clarification issued after the impugned order. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 30 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201525