<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 63 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201515</link>
    <description>The High Court rejected the main appeal filed by the revenue as it was not maintainable due to the tax effect being below Rs.2 lakhs, as per a circular by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. The court emphasized the need for a conscious decision to file appeals despite monetary limits for cases involving substantial legal issues. The judgment clarified that the decision was solely based on maintainability and should not be binding for future proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 14:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175123" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 63 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201515</link>
      <description>The High Court rejected the main appeal filed by the revenue as it was not maintainable due to the tax effect being below Rs.2 lakhs, as per a circular by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. The court emphasized the need for a conscious decision to file appeals despite monetary limits for cases involving substantial legal issues. The judgment clarified that the decision was solely based on maintainability and should not be binding for future proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>