https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201497 The High Court dismissed the appeals filed under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, emphasizing the necessity for substantial evidence to prove intentional clandestine removal of goods. The Court found insufficient evidence to establish evasion of Central Excise duty, highlighting the importance of adhering to legal provisions. The appeals were dismissed, underscoring the significance of concrete evidence in such cases. en-us Mon, 26 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Jan 2011 19:21:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201497 The High Court dismissed the appeals filed under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, emphasizing the necessity for substantial evidence to prove intentional clandestine removal of goods. The Court found insufficient evidence to establish evasion of Central Excise duty, highlighting the importance of adhering to legal provisions. The appeals were dismissed, underscoring the significance of concrete evidence in such cases. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 26 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201497