https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201471 The Division Bench directed the Department to conclude the investigation and issue a final order by a specified date, allowing the restraint order to continue until then with permission for exporting. The Department's final order was challenged by the respondents, leading to further legal proceedings. The court emphasized the importance of timely final orders and adherence to legal procedures. Disputes over manufacturing activities were resolved, with the court clarifying that the restraint order pertained to capital goods, not manufacturing, ultimately dismissing the petition for disobedience or contempt. en-us Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:43:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201471 The Division Bench directed the Department to conclude the investigation and issue a final order by a specified date, allowing the restraint order to continue until then with permission for exporting. The Department's final order was challenged by the respondents, leading to further legal proceedings. The court emphasized the importance of timely final orders and adherence to legal procedures. Disputes over manufacturing activities were resolved, with the court clarifying that the restraint order pertained to capital goods, not manufacturing, ultimately dismissing the petition for disobedience or contempt. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201471