<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 469 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201454</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad clarified the interpretation of provisions for filing cross-objection in customs cases. It held that cross-objection is permissible before the Commissioner (Appeals) under Section 129D(4) and not limited to appeals before the Tribunal under Section 129A(4). The Tribunal emphasized the scope of cross-objection, distinguishing between scenarios where only the Department or both the Department and assessee can file appeals based on the Original Authority&#039;s decision. The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s review of its order, stating that challenging the Original Authority&#039;s decision was impermissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2011 19:45:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175063" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 469 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201454</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad clarified the interpretation of provisions for filing cross-objection in customs cases. It held that cross-objection is permissible before the Commissioner (Appeals) under Section 129D(4) and not limited to appeals before the Tribunal under Section 129A(4). The Tribunal emphasized the scope of cross-objection, distinguishing between scenarios where only the Department or both the Department and assessee can file appeals based on the Original Authority&#039;s decision. The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s review of its order, stating that challenging the Original Authority&#039;s decision was impermissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201454</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>