https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201443 The Court held that since the matter had been decided by the Appellate Authority and was being reconsidered by the Approval Committee, there was no need for a stay on the earlier order. The petitioner was advised to seek remedy through proper channels if further aggrieved. The Court disposed of the writ petitions, stating that no relief could be granted regarding the stay of the order passed by the Approval Committee as the matter was under reconsideration. The petitioner was advised to approach the Unit Approval Committee or the Development Commissioner of the Special Economic Zone for further recourse. No costs were awarded in the judgment. en-us Mon, 28 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Jan 2011 14:03:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201443 The Court held that since the matter had been decided by the Appellate Authority and was being reconsidered by the Approval Committee, there was no need for a stay on the earlier order. The petitioner was advised to seek remedy through proper channels if further aggrieved. The Court disposed of the writ petitions, stating that no relief could be granted regarding the stay of the order passed by the Approval Committee as the matter was under reconsideration. The petitioner was advised to approach the Unit Approval Committee or the Development Commissioner of the Special Economic Zone for further recourse. No costs were awarded in the judgment. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 28 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201443